Categories
Terms and Conditions
All content expressed in the “Discuss” section of the National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) website are those of the author or authors and do not reflect the opinion of Academy staff or Board of Directors. The Academy reserves the right to edit or delete any comments deemed offensive or disrespectful.
Thinking about Retirement?
Social Security: Americans Agree VIDEO
.jpg)
Have you seen “Social Security: Americans Agree?” Click here to learn more.
Social Security: Just the Facts Video
Have you seen, “Social Security: Just the Facts?” Click here to learn more.
COVERED: a week-by-week look at the political and legislative developments that led to the creation of Medicare and Medicaid 50 years ago. Bob Rosenblatt, Academy senior fellow and former Los Angeles Times Washington correspondent will report on the people and the maneuvers that led to this major expansion of social insurance.
Discuss: Share in Our Policy Ideas
Social Security’s Cost-of-Living Adjustment: What Do Americans Want?
The purpose of Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is to automatically adjust benefits to keep up with rising prices. Experts have long disagreed about how the COLA should be calculated and the rate at which it should grow to fully protect beneficiaries against loss of purchasing power due to inflation.
Some experts say the current COLA does not keep up with the inflation that seniors face because seniors spend more on out-of-pocket health care costs, which generally rise faster than average inflation. Other experts say that the current COLA actually overstates inflation because it does not sufficiently factor in substitution between different categories of goods. A recent survey that asked Americans whether they favor or oppose 14 different policy changes finds that Americans would prefer to increase, rather than reduce, Social Security’s COLA (see table below).
|
Americans’ Views on Changing Social Security’s Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) |
||
|
|
Increase the COLA |
Reduce the COLA |
|
Favor |
64% |
30% |
|
Strongly |
31 |
11 |
|
Somewhat |
33 |
19 |
|
Not Sure |
26 |
33 |
|
Oppose |
10 |
37 |
|
Strongly |
3 |
17 |
|
Somewhat |
7 |
20 |
|
Source: National Academy of Social Insurance Survey, September 2012 |
||
The study, Strengthening Social Security: What Do Americans Want?,also finds that Americans’ preferred package of policy changes would more than eliminate Social Security’s financing gap by increasing payroll taxes and paying for modest benefit improvements – including increasing the COLA.
Survey respondents were told that one policy option would base the COLA on a measure of inflation that seniors actually experience. To illustrate, if general inflation from one year to the next is 3%, but inflation experienced by seniors is 3.2%, this COLA for the elderly would increase a $1,000 monthly benefit by $32 instead of by $30. This change would more fully protect seniors against inflation; it would also increase Social Security’s projected financing gap by 13%. Although 26% of survey respondents said they were “not sure” about this policy option, among respondents who did have opinions, those in favor outnumber those opposed by more than 6 to 1 (64% to 10%).
Another proposal presented to survey respondents would base the COLA on a measure of inflation (the chained CPI) that would result in increasing Social Security benefits less than the current COLA does. To illustrate, if inflation from one year to the next is 3%, but a new inflation measure goes up by only 2.7%, the COLA would increase a $1,000 monthly benefit by $27 instead of $30. This change would reduce seniors’ protection against inflation, and the seemingly small difference would add up over time, so the oldest seniors would experience the biggest benefit cuts. This change would reduce Social Security’s projected financing gap by 20%. More than half (55%) of respondents who have an opinion about reducing the COLA are opposed to it, and many are strongly opposed.
For more information about the COLA, see two of NASI’s fact sheets:
All Comments
— Forrest Chisman on March 12, 2013
— Lea Costo on March 13, 2013
Does the tax increase cover the costs on the SSDI cost problem as well as the retirement problem?
The proposed payroll tax increase from 12.4% to 14.4% to 16.4% is quite steep. Did the survey ask whether the added tax would be preferred when the costs for the Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare will need to be funded by increased taxes or benefit cuts or some combination of the two? In other words, do survey participants believe that this tax increase is the only tax increase they will be facing or did the survey force them to choose which program they would prefer their taxes to fund.
— Ed Muldoon on March 17, 2013
Thank you for your questions.
First, the tax increase we asked respondents about covers the entire OASDI system, including both retirement and disability.
Second, please see Appendix B of the full report for the information provided to and questions asked of the respondents. We did not address issues related to Medicare, Medicaid, or the ACA in the survey.
If you have additional questions, please don't hesitate to call our office: 202-452-8097.
Jasmine
— jtucker on March 25, 2013
How much does it cost? Only as few as 03 richest Americans hold net wealth after tax as large as more than 150 billions, let alone 100s of others. Our three words of the constitution: " we the people". Rights of the declaration of independence: "Life Liberty Pursuit of happiness."
Supreme law of the land is the constitution. Everyone must obey the law.
Hence logically it devolves upon our leaders at the helm to garner up by imposing social security tax to the employers and employees following progressive matrix of taxation, projecting 100 years notional profile of demand and supply of fund, a team of brilliant actuary examining and vetting. This is not a Republican agenda nor Democratic agenda it is verily an American agenda. Make no mistake! These ill fated people are our own people the're not a drop-down pariah from another planet! One who prioritizes one's privilege over principle soon he looses the both.
— S.A. Samad on May 10, 2019
— S.A. Samad on May 10, 2019
Post new comment