Share/Bookmark

Discuss: Share in Our Policy Ideas

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Understanding Mortality Improvement

Anna Rappaport

At the NASI annual meeting on January 27, some comments were made about mortality improvement. They require further elaboration and correction. The Society of Actuaries studies mortality to construct mortality tables for a variety of purposes, and to understand what is happening to high age mortality. It has had a special multi-disciplinary project on high age mortality and how it is improving for about the past ten years. The Living to 100 and beyond project papers and presentations can be found at http://livingto100.soa.org/.
 
Here are some key points about mortality improvement in the United States:
For the past 50 years, there have been major improvements in mortality within traditional retirement age ranges. The consequence of this is that periods of retirement have lengthened a great deal since Social Security started.
 
The table below reinforces just how much life spans have changed without very much change in normal retirement ages.
 
Life Expectancies of the U.S. Population, By Age and Calendar Year
 

 

 
Males
Age 0
Females
Age 0
Male
Age 65
Female
Age 65
1935
59.4
63.3
11.9
13.2
2010
75.4
80.0
16.6
19.2
2050 proj
79.5
83.6
18.9
21.4

 

Source: Social Security Administration, Actuarial Study Number 120, Table 10, Life Tables for the United States.
 
Mortality is continuing to improve, but there is disagreement about how rapid the improvement will be in the future, and whether the rate of improvement will slow or increase. Some experts expect future improvements to be slower than the improvements of the last fifty years. Obesity is a factor contributing to the slowing of mortality improvement, but scientific breakthroughs are still a possibility.
 
Social Security mortality projection factors illustrate one set of projection factors developed after substantial study of improvement. Improvement factors are used in the actuarial valuations for Social Security, many private pensions and annuity contracts.
 
There are significant differences in mortality improvement by group, including racial and class/income differences. However, racial differences are not reflected in insurance and pension mortality studies, as these systems do not maintain data by race. Insurance companies are generally not permitted to consider race in pricing. Several of the 2011 Living to 100 papers show differences by race.
 
Mortality in the U.S. is not the lowest in the world, and some other countries have faster declines in mortality.
Posted on February 8, 2011  |  Add your comment
Keywords:

All Comments

Any of this data broken down by ethnic groups? My non scientific observation shows much wider gender gap among Jewish men ad women.
I coannt tell a lie, that really helped.
Geez, that's unbelieavble. Kudos and such.
Any of this data broken down by ethnic groups? My non scientific observation shows much wider gender gap among Jewish men ad women.

Post new comment

If you have an account, please login first so we can retrieve your information.

Your e-mail address is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Please note that some comments are moderated, so it might take a few moments for your comment to appear on the site.